<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WiFi Radio Review &#187; Roberts WM201</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wifiradioreview.com/tag/roberts-wm201/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wifiradioreview.com</link>
	<description>WiFi Radio News, Reviews and Deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 06:17:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The WM201 is one spankingly good WiFi radio,&#8221; says T3</title>
		<link>http://www.wifiradioreview.com/2008/03/the-wm201-is-one-spankingly-good-wifi-radio-says-t3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wifiradioreview.com/2008/03/the-wm201-is-one-spankingly-good-wifi-radio-says-t3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Neill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roberts WM201]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roberts WM201 review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.wifiradioreview.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Performance doesn&#8217;t disappoint&#8230;belting out loud, powerful music with authoritative bass even D&#38;B lovers will be happy.&#8221; Do they have ANYTHING bad to say? Well, it seems the looks aren&#8217;t sparking debate. &#8220;Whatever it reminds you of you&#8217;ll either love or loathe the look of the high-quality Roberts WM201.&#8221; Read more here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_182" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-182" href="http://test.wifiradioreview.com/2008/03/the-wm201-is-one-spankingly-good-wifi-radio-says-t3/wm201/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-182" title="Roberts WM201" src="http://test.wifiradioreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/wm201-300x300.jpg" alt="Roberts WM201" width="300" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Roberts WM201 - you love or loathe its looks</p></div>
<p>&#8220;Performance doesn&#8217;t disappoint&#8230;belting out loud, powerful music  with authoritative bass even D&amp;B lovers will be happy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Do they have ANYTHING bad to say? Well, it seems the looks aren&#8217;t sparking debate.</p>
<p>&#8220;Whatever it reminds you of you&#8217;ll either love or loathe the look of the  high-quality Roberts WM201.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.t3.com/home-entertainment/radio/roberts-wm201-review">Read more here.</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wifiradioreview.com%2F2008%2F03%2Fthe-wm201-is-one-spankingly-good-wifi-radio-says-t3%2F&amp;title=%26%238220%3BThe%20WM201%20is%20one%20spankingly%20good%20WiFi%20radio%2C%26%238221%3B%20says%20T3"><img src="http://www.wifiradioreview.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wifiradioreview.com/2008/03/the-wm201-is-one-spankingly-good-wifi-radio-says-t3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

