<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revo Heritage is &#8216;lovely&#8217; but &#8216;better value to be had elsewhere&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wifiradioreview.com/2010/02/revo-heritage-is-lovely-but-better-value-to-be-had-elsewhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wifiradioreview.com/2010/02/revo-heritage-is-lovely-but-better-value-to-be-had-elsewhere/</link>
	<description>WiFi Radio News, Reviews and Deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:28:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Maguire</title>
		<link>http://www.wifiradioreview.com/2010/02/revo-heritage-is-lovely-but-better-value-to-be-had-elsewhere/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>K Maguire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wifiradioreview.com/?p=237#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t think this is fair. Yeah,it&#039;s £80 more than a Pure Evoke Flow, but with iPod connectivity, better audio, more expensive materials and a more attractive design (in my opinion). Throw in the Last.fm feature and I think the price difference is more than justified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think this is fair. Yeah,it&#8217;s £80 more than a Pure Evoke Flow, but with iPod connectivity, better audio, more expensive materials and a more attractive design (in my opinion). Throw in the Last.fm feature and I think the price difference is more than justified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

